The Folkish Minimum
A collection of people is not a political movement unless it has the following things in common:
Ideals
Goals
Leadership
Strategy
The “radical right” contains so many discordant factions that it can’t be said to possess any of these elements. Therefore it is not a movement. It is rather a collection of different movements whose only common points are that they are broadly on the right and are outside of mainstream discourse.
In the face of this situation, it may be useful to provide a “folkish minimum” i.e. the basic points that one has to agree to in order to be considered to be part of a folkish movement. These are as follows:
1. That the main issue of our time is that our folks of European origin are being actively undermined by our political and economic elites through the liberal managerial capitalist system. Every other issue is dwarfed by this.
2. We must work to remove these elites and dismantle the system by which they perpetuate their control.
3. We must replace it with an order—run by our own elite built through a vanguard movement—in which the political, economic and legal systems of each Western country are explicitly built around the recognition of the distinctive nature of the founding folk and the imperative of the preservation of its interests and autonomy.
4. Notions such as individualism, free trade, free movement of people, universal human rights, and minoritarianism, because they are inherently corrosive to the interests of our folks and reinforce the rule of hostile groups, have to be eradicated.
The logic of these elements (and their prioritization, if any) makes more sense for European Whites defending their existing ethny within their ancient homelands. Perhaps that's as far as 'folkish' can ever extend. But, if intended to be a foundation for the entire defense of the White race including the White Diaspora, then the sheer scale of North America needs to be considered when discussing 2. Also, with regard to 3, rendering our current elites irrelevant in North America is easier than dismantling the system as it currently exists. To return to 2, the pro-White movement in North America is unlikely to ever take control of the entire continent for perhaps hundreds of years, maybe never. Pro-Whites in North America, especially those in areas where a 'normal' White majority still exists should look to separation and nullification in lieu of seizing the means of decision as the language of 2 seems to imply. 1 and 4 are definitely true of all Whites everywhere.